Hillary Is too Weak to Stop Terrorism

 

COMMON SENSE: While CNN was busy deleting Hillary’s use of the word “bomb” in her interview, after the attacks in NY Saturday night—in an effort to make her look good and Trump look bad—the Jihadists were busy planning their next attack.

 

We have allowed this Trojan Horse of Radical Islam into our country, and we are going to pay a terrible price to get rid of it. Using the Internet, the “Cyber Islamic Army” is busy recruiting, indoctrinating, and sending out misguided fools to create havoc and carnage in America, while Obama is busy telling us how peaceful Islam is.

 

The time for submitting to this politically correct nonsense, at the expense of American lives, is over. We need new leadership, from people who are not corrupt, to forge the way. If we continue doing the same thing, which is Hillary’s strategy, we will continue to get the same results. This tired, sick old woman cannot possibly do the job necessary to keep us safe. Trump has been consistently right on the issue of terrorism, and he is definitely strong enough to protect us. The choice is clear.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

It’s Time to Deal with Terrorism Harshly

COMMON SENSE: At this time four years ago, while lying about what was really behind the Benghazi attack, Obama’s position was Osama bin Laden was dead, al Qaeda was on the run, and ISIS was the JV team. Believing Obama’s false narrative to be true, Americans continued to deny reality by choosing the more politically-correct position of toleration toward a worldview that is antithetical to ours.

 

We were wrong then and, if we choose Hillary’s perpetuation of Obama’s error, we will continue to be wrong. Even worse, we will sustain repeated attacks for the next four years. This is what will happen, whether you are willing to admit it is true or not.

 

In the past 24 hours, we have sustained attacks in MN, NY, and NJ—all blue states. Radical Islamisists don’t differentiate between the right and left. To them, we are all the Great Satan.

 

Isn’t it time to stand up to these monsters? Isn’t it time to abandon our false narrative and call things what they really are? Isn’t it time to deal with these terrorists harshly and put an end to Radical Islamic Jihadism in America?

 

If your answer to these questions is yes, then you know what you need to do.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Our Foreign Policy Needs to Change

COMMON SENSE: World War II ended in August 1945. When it did, Germany and Japan were reduced to rubble. Pouring money and ideas into both nations, we began the arduous task of nation building, with surprising success. Both Germany and Japan embraced democracy and have become strong allies of the United States ever since. When the Korean War ended, we used the same strategy in South Korea, and they have also become a strong democracy and ally.

Having been so successful, the United States has maintained the conviction that we can win every war and successfully rebuild vanquished enemies into successful democracies, just like we did in Germany, Japan, and South Korea. As successful as that model was, it doesn’t always work. In fact, it has never worked again. Yet, we keep trying to replicate it, despite having failed miserably in Indochina and the Middle East.

The reason we are no longer successful is we are trying to force our solution on people who don’t want it, especially in the Middle East. People who want Sharia Law have nothing but contempt for constitutional democracy. Remember seeing the footage of people with a black thumb in Iraq, showing us they had voted? Although this made us feel good, it was an illusion. It seemed like we had won but we hadn’t. That was an illusion as time has revealed.

We need to realize that our post World War II model no longer works. We cannot successfully impose our will on others. This was Bush 43’s error and Obama’s too. Instead, out of self-preservation, where political Islam is concerned, our policy should be one of containment. It’s all we can do, but it’s all we need to do to remain safe.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Obama’s & Hillary’s Legacy of Failure

COMMON SENSE: Barack Obama began his Presidency by receiving the Nobel Peace Prize—not for what he had done but for what he was going to do. Teaming with Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State, this dynamic duo hit the “Reset Button,” not only with Russia but also in the Middle East. Bolstered by their erudite Progressive worldview, the United States finally had the leadership we needed to right what was wrong and usher in a more equatable system—the New World Order.

Now, as Obama’s second term is about to expire, instead of marveling at his accomplishments, we have to shake our collective heads at what a monumental failure he has been. The Middle East has destabilized dramatically, except for Iran, where they are busy producing nuclear weapons to destroy Israel and us—thanks to Barack Obama. Russian imperialism has ramped up considerably, and the European democracies are being destabilized by Radical Islam, which neither Obama or Hillary have the ability or moral courage to oppose adequately. All they can do is bluster, which they do routinely.

With Obama dancing the tango and Hillary selling favors to the highest bidder, our republic is being threatened by an Evil Wing of Islam that our leaders refuse to acknowledge even exists. Despite this, in his mind, Obama believes he has earned his Nobel Peace Prize, and Hillary is making plans to extort one for herself.

We can stop this nonsense dead in its tracks, of course, but will we? Or, will we continue on the path of certain destruction by arguing about how many angels can dance on the head of a pin?

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Hillary’s Strategy Versus Trump’s

COMMON SENSE: Here is my advise: Stick to your values and your determination to retake our nation back from Progressives like Obama and Hillary. They will do everything they can to thwart our efforts, especially with the sycophantic liberal media. For example, the ABC—Washington Post Poll that has Hillary ahead by 12 points is weighed heavily toward Democrats 2.5-to-1; but you never heard that, did you? The poll was purposefully skewed to shape public opinion, rather than reflect it, showing how dishonorable the media can be.

 

In the campaign, Hillary will spend $2 billion to paint Trump as unfit and dangerous, which he is not. She has to do this. It’s her only card. She can’t run on her record, since she has failed at everything she has ever done. Obviously, she can’t run on her character, so all she can do is attack Trump mercilessly.

 

To win, Trump needs to stay on message, and it should be this: If you want four more years of global retreat, Hillary is your candidate. If you want to make America great again, vote for me.

 

If you want to see your wages lose buying power, while increasing our national debt to fund illegals, vote for Hillary. If you want “huge” growth, vote for me.

 

If you are content to be lied to, and are fine with denying the global threat of Radical Islamic Terrorism, choose Hillary. If you want the military restored and ISIS destroyed, vote for me.

 

If you don’t mind working hard to barely make it, while the establishment elites become fabulously wealthy at your expense, vote for the most corrupt politician in American history, Hillary Rodham Clinton. If you want somebody who will work for free—just to make you better off—vote for me, Donald J. Trump.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Yes, Naming “Radical Islamic Terrorism” Is Important

COMMON SENSE: President Obama, who is a master at deflecting, tried to strike back at those who criticize him for not calling Radical Islamic Terrorism what it is. I’m sure multiplied millions will join him in mocking Donald Trump and people like me for making an issue about something Obama considers unimportant, but it is important.

 

First, it isn’t just the term that is at issue. Through the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, Obama has a small army of doctrinaire Progressive lawyers who relentlessly impose Obama’s worldview on America. Since Obama venerates Islam, nothing truthful that criticizes the “Religion of Peace” is allowed. Because this hampers our risk assessment of impending danger, Obama’s delusional thinking about Islam’s peacefulness makes us unsafe. Innocent people are dying because of this, and many more will follow.

 

Second, through the Department of Homeland Security, Obama and his sycophantic Progressive toady’s have opened our boarders to allow undocumented militant Muslims into our nation by the thousands. This is a true Trojan Horse that will cause many needless deaths in the future. It’s inevitable.

 

Third, Obama’s justification for not calling Jihadism what is is, is that it would be a great recruitment tool for ISIS. Supposedly, it would give young Muslims a reason to hate us, which doesn’t make a bit of sense. They already hate us. Instead of capitulating to them, which Muslims consider to be a sign of weakness—because it is—we need to be in their face constantly. That will work. Appeasement will not.

 

One more thing: Hillary, who has helped Obama get us into this mess, is now wiling to call radicals what they are. This isn’t surprising though. She will say anything or do anything to get elected—sleaze that she is.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Hillary Failed at the State Department

COMMON SENSE: I find it interesting that Hillary Clinton is saying that her experience makes her more fit to be Commander-in-Chief, while simultaneously doing everything she can do to hide and mislead voters about her tenure at the State Department. Everything she put her hand to, while being our Secretary of State, failed. Nevertheless, because she held the job for four years, she must be a better choice for President than Donald Trump, right?

 

This convoluted logic just doesn’t make sense. It’s like asking Elizabeth Taylor to give marital advise. Having been married nine times, she must be an expert. Touting Hillary’s experience uses the same logic, but it is flawed. Hillary failed at being Secretary of State, but she was successful at using her position of authority to make a fortune.

 

That it was accomplished at the expense of you, and every other American, is not her problem. Now, she is asking you to buy her deception and make her dream of becoming President a reality.

 

You should help her out, right? After all, it is a woman’s turn to be President, isn’t it?

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Closing GITMO Denies the Reality of Terrorist Threat

COMMON SENSE: President Obama, fully intent on fulfilling his campaign promise to his Progressive base to shutdown GITMO, intends to release the mastermind behind the attack on the USS Cole. For me, his decision about this is personal, as the following passage from “Hi, My Name Is Jack” indicates.

 

“But it didn’t work. The video evidence against Papaw was clear and compelling. He was the pedophile, not Hugh; and the sleazy lawyer couldn’t sustain his false accusations. Hugh was spared and never really knew how close he came to disaster.

 

When Hugh finished high school, he went on to the Naval Academy where he played football for the Midshipmen. After graduation, he was an officer aboard the USS Cole. While in Yemen in October 2000, the ship was attacked by Osama bin Laden’s al-Quaida terrorists. Hugh’s quick actions, as reported in the press, saved several lives. None of this would have happened if Papaw and his sleazy lawyer had been successful in destroying his life before it began. And the video we took of Jordan that day was the prime evidence that Papaw could not refute.”

 

According to Obama and his Progressive cronies, GITMO’s continuation gives ISIS a powerful recruitment tool, and we must not do that. At the same time, Obama and Hillary are pushing the Gay & Lesbian agenda full force, which obviously offends Muslims much more than anything else would.

 

Obama and Hillary want it both ways. They do not care about the 17 sailors killed that day or the 39 wounded—not like they care about pleasing the Leftists in Hollywood. After all, what difference, at this point, does it make?

 

Link to “Hi, My Name Is Jack“

Read Full Post »

Socialists and ProgressivesWill Never Defeat Terrorism

COMMON SENSE: This statement, which seems comical, is actually quite poignant. It reveals why the Western Democracies, including the USA, have been unable to combat al Qaeda and ISIS effectively, but the problem isn’t just with Bernie. It goes much deeper.

 

Essentially, Socialists and Progressives—people like Obama, Kerry, and Hillary—have a fundamental flaw in their belief system. According to their way of thinking, which features a materialistic worldview rather than a theistic one, there is something missing in the lives of terrorists. Therefore, the way to end terrorism is to discover what the problem is, and find a way to provide a solution.

 

One non-theistic interpretation of the problem is this: Because of climate change, the Middle East is becoming uninhabitable. The terrorists are simply trying to fight their way out of the desert to find more suitable surroundings. So, the answer isn’t to fight them; it’s to find them a better place to live.

 

Leaders in our State Department, and many others in Europe, actually believe nonsense like this is true. It’s what makes us as vulnerable as we are. Our greatest enemy isn’t Jihadism; it’s the flawed thinking of Progressives and Socialists.

 

At its core, Radical Islamic Terrorism is a theological problem. They want a worldwide Caliphate—one ushered in by the blood of Islamic martyrs. Until Sharia Law is universally accepted worldwide, they will not be satisfied. Because their traditional enemy, Israel, will never bow their knees and accept Allah as supreme, all Jews must die. The USA, the Great Satan, is next.

 

In 1492, when Columbus was discovering the New World, the Spanish monarchs, Ferdinand and Isabella, expelled all Muslims from Europe. Although history has not been kind to them for this, it’s becoming increasingly easier to understand why they did it, isn’t it?

 

Twice before, the Islamic assault on the West has been stopped in its tracks, sending these barbarians back to where they belong. This feat was accomplished by those who understood that the problem was actually a war of belief systems—Islam versus Judeo-Christianity. That hasn’t changed. It’s still the same fight, but the Progressives and Socialists don’t have the capacity to understand it. Because they cannot conceptualize in terms like this, they are incapable of resolving the problem. With Progressives leading us, we will never be safe.

 

Muslims Jihadists understand brute force and nothing else. Playing nice, and trying to understand them, doesn’t work. It never has, and it never will. It’s also the reason why electing Progressives is self-defeating. If you want to be safe, you have to elect people who understand the problem, and Hillary certainly isn’t one of them.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

America First—Trump; No Borders—Kerry, Obama, Hillary

COMMON SENSE: In the Presidential Election, many news items are unimportant, but not all of them. Some things are very important—a few are critical. Take what Secretary of State John Kerry said to the graduating students at Northeastern University, for example. He told them that one day they would be living in a “world without borders,” implying that this would be a good thing.

 

This is what the Progressives want—a world without borders. Having no borders means the United States would have to embrace whoever comes, regardless of who they are. In their desire to create a Utopian dream world, Progressives like Kerry, Obama, and Hillary Clinton abhor American nationalism, mocking those who desire strong borders.

 

To them, their worldview is sophisticated. Our belief system, by way of contrast, is outdated and doomed to fail. In the Progressive mindset, our military might be necessary, but honoring American soldiers or taking care of them is unimportant. Without borders, you would still need some policemen but not the Army or the Navy.

 

Because Donald Trump wants to “Make America Great Again,” which is the exact opposite of what Obama, Kerry, and Hillary want, they loathe him. He espouses the exact opposite of what they desire for the future to be.

 

When you think of it like this, it’s easy to see why they hate Trump him so much, and will do anything to discredit him. As you can see, this is a critical issue—not a trivial one. If you believe in borders and want America to come first, choose Trump. If you want a world without borders, Hillary is your candidate. It’s as simple as that.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »