Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for August, 2016

th-21COMMON SENSE: As more comes out about Hillary’s corruption and pay-to-play scheme, requiring donations to her foundation before gaining access, I wonder what Barack Obama is thinking? Don’t you? He was her boss, but she not only lied to him, she also authorized her private server before she was even confirmed. This means she planed to be corrupt from day one. She didn’t just drift into it, and her actions definitely will taint Obama’s legacy.
 
Another thing to think about is this: If Hillary was this corrupt as Secretary of State, when she had limited power, how corrupt will she be when her power is 100 times greater? If she lied to Obama about what she intended to do, what would make anybody think she’s telling us the truth now? To take her at her word is ludicrous. Since past performance is the best indicator of future actions, we can count on Hillary to be deceitful, corrupt, and incompetent—nothing more, nothing less.
 
Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

14079579_746539535488565_5348348294216792894_n
COMMON SENSE: Hillary Clinton is the reason why the Presidential Campaign is so negative—not Donald J. Trump. Because she cannot taut her record of accomplishment, failing miserably at everything she has ever done, especially at being our Secretary of State, all she can do is say, “Trump is more unsuitable than I am.”
 
This is exactly what she is doing by calling Trump a racist, which he is not. If anything, the charge of racism could be levied at her, but I don’t it would be true, accurate or fair to do so. Her avowed mentor was Sen. Harry Byrd, who was a member of the Ku Klux Clan at one time. Bill Clinton’s mentor was Sen. J. William Fulbright, also a member of the Clan. So, both Clintons do have a connection, although a thin one.
 
There is no historical record to indicate that Trump has ever had anything to do with the Ku Klux Clan, but Hillary is accusing him of being one of their supporters. A non-politician, Trump didn’t even know who David Dukes was. Being a minor player, not many people know who he is.
 
Because Hillary is deceitful and corrupt, she has to do everything she can to put the spotlight on Trump, rather than answer uncomfortable questions about her pay-to-play scheme, where she used her position of authority to amass a fortune for her foundation. She should be in the jailhouse—not the White House.
 
Jack Watts  

Read Full Post »

12647126_929269360475183_8664983865575063534_nCOMMON SENSE: FBI Director Comey testified that there was “no intention” to deceive coming from Hillary Clinton, concerning her private email server. We now know that isn’t true. Hillary did intend to deceive everybody about her activities from day one. By using the BleachBit program to hide her deleted emails, shredding them electronically, making them impossible to recover, Hillary’s intentionality has been established.
 
We, the American people, cannot let this stand. Hillary Clinton needs to be prosecuted. President Obama needs to do his job, starting with the removal of Loretta Lynch and James Comey—both of whom have been compromised. If Obama refuses, Congress needs to step in. The level of corruption here is greater than Watergate. It needs to be ferreted out—period!
 
—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Julian_Assange_August_2014.jpgCOMMON SENSE: I disagree with most Conservatives about Julian Assange. I support his efforts to expose Hillary’s emails. Here’s why:
 
1. By not using a government server, as she promised she would, Hillary has brought all of this on herself with her own illegal, reckless behavior.
 
2. Since Bill Clinton cut a deal with Attorney General Loretta Lynch, which only a fool would deny, to keep the American people in the dark, Assange is our only hope of getting to the truth of Hillary’s corruption before the election.
 
3. The FBI, which I used to believe was incorruptible, has proven to be no better than the DOJ. Both agencies have made her above the law.
 
4. If Assange doesn’t post Hillary’s emails and she wins in November, the Russians and Chinese, who have most certainly hacked Hillary’s server, can use what they have on her to blackmail her into being as weak-willed as Obama. That we definitely cannot afford.
 
5. Since Hillary considered the emails about the Clinton Foundation to be private, rather than having anything to do with State Department business, she did not include any of them in what she turned over. Thus, the evidence of her pay-to-play corruption is in those 14,900 that should have been made available to Congress and the FBI.
 
6. Since we can no longer trust our government to tell the truth, we must rely on others to do it. We have no other choice. Daniel Ellsberg was considered a hero for publishing “The Pentagon Papers.” He blew the whistle on President Nixon, and it was needed. I believe that what Assange has is necessary for the American people to know, and I believe he is just as heroic as Ellsberg.
 
—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

 

 

static1.squarespace-1COMMON SENSE: Here is the “smoking gun” with Hillary. None of the emails she turned over to Congress or the FBI were related to the Clinton Foundation. She considered those email to be her personal business—like the one’s involving Chelsea’s wedding and yoga classes. This is her greatest vulnerability, and she knows it. Now that they are coming out, her house of cards may finally collapse, but I’m not holding my breath. The Queen of Corruption has more lives than Barbara Baird from the Moon Series.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

hillary trump_4.jpgCOMMON SENSE: It is immoral to support Donald J. Trump, according to the mainstream media. Only an ignorant bigot, someone devoid of compassion and basic human dignity, would even consider doing so. He is the champion of the ignorant, the vile, the uneducated, the obtuse, and nobody else. Worse, he definitely does not represent American values.
 
Relentlessly hammering this message home, reporters and anchors from the Left have been successful in their attempts to marginalize Donald Trump, painting the picture that he would be a destructive force for America. Unfortunately, some of Trump’s missteps have helped make this picture more plausible. This message, brilliantly elucidated, has had one purpose—to ensure that Trump will never be President. To these Leftists, objectivity in reporting is not nearly as important as destroying Trump in the eyes of the American people.
 
At the same time, our “objective media” has not said that a vote for Hillary Clinton would be the moral alternative. If any of them said this openly, because Hillary is deceitful and corrupt, which everybody knows, the media would lose their audience. Since she’s the only alternative, however, it’s obviously implied. It’s never stated though, which is strategically brilliant. All they have needed to do is discredit Trump. Having done so, support for Hillary, although reluctant, would be the inevitable alternative.
 
The only thing standing in the way of the media’s success is you. Are you smart enough to see through what they are doing? Are you wise enough to realize that their disapprobation of Trump has nothing to do with his policies? Are you plugged in enough to see that the media’s criticisms of Trump are actually true of Hillary? If so, then we may still save our great nation from the manipulations of these amoral, reprehensible Sophists.
 
—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

hillary-clinton-glare-getty-images-640x480
COMMON SENSE: Have you ever been in a relationship where your partner questioned your fidelity, even though their misgivings were groundless? They were suspicious of everything you did, even the way you smiled at a complete stranger at the mall or at church. You found yourself having to explain and justify everything you did and thought. Have you ever been in a situation like this?
 
If you have, you may not have thought it through, but your partner was probably projecting onto you what he or she was actually doing. It was their way of justifying their duplicitous infidelity. Projection like this happens a lot.
 
It also occurs in politics. Take Hillary Clinton for example. Her charge that Donald Trump is “too reckless” to be trusted with the nuclear codes is groundless, and it’s a projection about her own behavior. She repeats this charge wherever she goes, despite the fact that she is the one who the FBI has labelled “careless” about the way she handled classified material. Her negligence should have disqualified her, but it hasn’t—thanks to the DOJ’s fix. Instead of being sorry, Hillary, aided by the media, has chosen to project her own egregious behavior onto Trump. She accuses him of the very thing about which she is guilty.
 
Hillary is the one who cannot be trusted—not with anything. I base this conclusion solely on her past performance, which is the best predictor of future behavior.
 
—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Older Posts »