Hillary Is Unfit to Be Commander-in-Chief

COMMON SENSE: Everybody knows that past performance is the best indicator for future behavior. That being said, while Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty were fighting for their lives, trying to hold on until help came, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was huddled in the White House planning how to spin their deaths. Help never came of course, but Hillary did make up a good story. Her goal wasn’t to save them but to deflect from her malfeasance and to ensure Barack Obama’s reelection.

 

Now, four years later, despite all of her efforts to stonewall the investigation, we know exactly what happened. If she is elected President, she will throw our military under the bus to save her rear—just like she did at Benghazi. She is untrustworthy, consistently deceitful, and unfit to be Commander-in-Chief. That the Democrats would nominate her is shameful, but that they don’t care what she did is even worse.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Hillary’s Moral Depravity Is Unrivaled

COMMON SENSE: During the Benghazi attack, the two unarmed drones flying overhead provided real-time intelligence to the White House, State Department, and Pentagon. This means that while Hillary was having meetings, planning on how to use the You Tube video to cover her rear, she had access to video that showed the fight was still going on—just like when she watched the attack on Osama bin Laden. Yet, when it came to our brave warriors in Benghazi, she did nothing to try and save them—nothing.

 

She let them die, never lifting a finger to help. She just didn’t care. Hillary is cold. I’ve always known that, but what she did—or didn’t do—shows a level of moral depravity that few can rival. She must never be our President.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Hillary’s Strategy Against Trump Just Collapsed

COMMON SENSE: Using carefully crafted phrases, each tested by focus groups, Hillary’s campaign injects just enough truth, mixed with deceit and innuendo, to garner support from the naive, the ignorant, and the depraved—all to attack the character and qualifications of Donald J. Trump.

 

She intends to spend more than $1 billion, painting a word picture of Trump as being dangerous, reckless, and unfit to be Commander-in-Chief. By contrast, she purports herself to have the wisdom, experience, and steady hand to lead us in time of crisis.

 

Her strategy is impressive, except for one thing. It just fell apart at the press conference held by the Benghazi Select Committee, and the big winner is Trump. Without having to spend a dime in refutation of Hilary’s massive campaign, the committee’s report has done the work for him.

 

In a word picture, Hillary surmises what Trump might do in a crisis, and it isn’t good. But what we now have are facts, showing that when a real crisis occurred under her watch, she didn’t lift a finger to save American lives. Instead, at the meeting held, while those brave men fought for their lives, Hillary’s focus was on saving her political career, ensuring Barack Obama’s reelection, and deceiving the American people about what really happened.

 

We know what kind of Commander-in-chief she would make, don’t we? She doesn’t have the character qualities we need in a leader. Hillary is unfit to be President of the United States.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Hillary’s Strategy Versus Trump’s

COMMON SENSE: Here is my advise: Stick to your values and your determination to retake our nation back from Progressives like Obama and Hillary. They will do everything they can to thwart our efforts, especially with the sycophantic liberal media. For example, the ABC—Washington Post Poll that has Hillary ahead by 12 points is weighed heavily toward Democrats 2.5-to-1; but you never heard that, did you? The poll was purposefully skewed to shape public opinion, rather than reflect it, showing how dishonorable the media can be.

 

In the campaign, Hillary will spend $2 billion to paint Trump as unfit and dangerous, which he is not. She has to do this. It’s her only card. She can’t run on her record, since she has failed at everything she has ever done. Obviously, she can’t run on her character, so all she can do is attack Trump mercilessly.

 

To win, Trump needs to stay on message, and it should be this: If you want four more years of global retreat, Hillary is your candidate. If you want to make America great again, vote for me.

 

If you want to see your wages lose buying power, while increasing our national debt to fund illegals, vote for Hillary. If you want “huge” growth, vote for me.

 

If you are content to be lied to, and are fine with denying the global threat of Radical Islamic Terrorism, choose Hillary. If you want the military restored and ISIS destroyed, vote for me.

 

If you don’t mind working hard to barely make it, while the establishment elites become fabulously wealthy at your expense, vote for the most corrupt politician in American history, Hillary Rodham Clinton. If you want somebody who will work for free—just to make you better off—vote for me, Donald J. Trump.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Where Is Omar Mateen’s Wife?

COMMON SENSE: Our leaders continue to promote the false narrative that they are in control and terrorism, particularly ISIS, is on the run. Yet, the Department of Homeland Security, the FBI, and the Orlando Police Department have lost track of Omar Mateen’s wife, his accomplice in murdering 49 people at Pulse—the gay nightclub.

Where is she? What is being done to find her? And why isn’t this a major news story? Is something fishy going on here? None of this makes sense to me. How about you?

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Hillary, Obama, Kerry Enable Terrorism

COMMON SENSE: In recovery, an enabler is someone who misguidedly abets an addict, refusing to allow that person to face the consequences of his or her actions—like Hillary defending her sexual predator husband, Bill.

 

Likewise, every time Obama, Hillary, or Kerry refuse to call Radical Islamic Terrorism what it is, they become enablers for terrorists. They are providing these monsters cover, regardless of what their motivation might be. If every person in America understood this, nobody would vote for Hillary, Obama’s approval rating would tank, and people would see Kerry for the fool that he is.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

The Gun Control Issue Is Sleazy Democrat Cynicism

COMMON SENSE: In 2009 and 2010, the Democrats controlled the White House and Congress—both the Senate and the House. They could have passed as much gun legislation as they pleased. Having the Presidency and and Congress, they were unstoppable.

 

Do you know how many gun bills they proposed during those two years? None, Nada, ZIP. Back then, Col. Nadal slaughtered 13 at Fort Hood. Why didn’t their “outrage over guns” stir Obama, Pelosi, and Reid to action back then instead of now?

 

I’ll tell you why. It’s because they see a political advantage . . . nothing else.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Gay People Should Not Support Hillary

COMMON SENSE: In the 1930s, anti-Semitism was very strong in Germany, but nobody was executed because of it. It wasn’t until the NAZI’s made it policy, using the force of the state, to kill Jews and homosexuals that the Holocaust began.

 

It’s the same thing now. There is still anti-Semitism and anti-gay sentiment in the Western Democracies, but there are no executions because of it—no pogroms. In Muslim countries, however, where they practice Sharia Law, it’s different. In Iran, for example, there are 75 million people but no gays—none. How could that be, you might ask? It’s simple. Using the force of the state, where execution is legitimized, they execute gays—all of them—or at least as many as they can find. It’s the same with ISIS.

 

Despite this, the Obama administration has been very supportive of Iran—Hillary too. Valerie Jarrett, his chief advisor, is Iranian. At the same time, without question or discernment, gays support Obama, Hillary, and the Democrats, never connecting the dots that this is not in their best interest. Perhaps it’s time gays rethink their strategy.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Yes, Naming “Radical Islamic Terrorism” Is Important

COMMON SENSE: President Obama, who is a master at deflecting, tried to strike back at those who criticize him for not calling Radical Islamic Terrorism what it is. I’m sure multiplied millions will join him in mocking Donald Trump and people like me for making an issue about something Obama considers unimportant, but it is important.

 

First, it isn’t just the term that is at issue. Through the Department of Justice’s Civil Rights Division, Obama has a small army of doctrinaire Progressive lawyers who relentlessly impose Obama’s worldview on America. Since Obama venerates Islam, nothing truthful that criticizes the “Religion of Peace” is allowed. Because this hampers our risk assessment of impending danger, Obama’s delusional thinking about Islam’s peacefulness makes us unsafe. Innocent people are dying because of this, and many more will follow.

 

Second, through the Department of Homeland Security, Obama and his sycophantic Progressive toady’s have opened our boarders to allow undocumented militant Muslims into our nation by the thousands. This is a true Trojan Horse that will cause many needless deaths in the future. It’s inevitable.

 

Third, Obama’s justification for not calling Jihadism what is is, is that it would be a great recruitment tool for ISIS. Supposedly, it would give young Muslims a reason to hate us, which doesn’t make a bit of sense. They already hate us. Instead of capitulating to them, which Muslims consider to be a sign of weakness—because it is—we need to be in their face constantly. That will work. Appeasement will not.

 

One more thing: Hillary, who has helped Obama get us into this mess, is now wiling to call radicals what they are. This isn’t surprising though. She will say anything or do anything to get elected—sleaze that she is.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Obama Still Can’t Call It Islamic Terrorism

 

COMMON SENSE: While murdering 50 in Orlando, Omar Mateen yelled, “Allahu Akbar”—just like all other Muslim Jihadists do, when they are killing innocent people. Yet, President Obama used his news conference as an opportunity to push his gun control agenda, rather than address the real problem, which is Muslim Terrorism. Obama didn’t say one word about Muslim terror, despite this being the worst mass murder in American history.

It’s obvious Obama is incapable of acknowledging reality or dealing with it. Neither is Obama 2.0—Hillary Clinton. How many more mass murders do we have to endure before we are willing to admit the problem is Radical Muslim Jihadism? Our President is supposed to keep us safe. It’s his #1 job, but Obama is far more concerned with furthering his Progressive agenda on gun control than abiding by the oath he took to protect us.

—Jack Watts

 

Read Full Post »