Syrian Refugees Are a Trojan Horse

COMMON SENSE: Pulling at the heartstrings of Progressives, other Leftists, and naive Christians, here is an impassioned plea from those of the Religion of Peace for help. To refuse aid to the destitute just seems wrong, doesn’t it? Of course it does . . . if you are a fool.

 

Look at the photo carefully. Where are the women? Where are the children? Where are the elderly? They aren’t there because these young men, who should be fighting for their own country, are not refugees. They are a Trojan Army, acting like a serpent, ready to strike at the infidels of the West, including us—the Great Satan.

 

That there are millions of fools in the Western Democracies is obvious. That these fools call us hateful for pointing out the truth about what is happening is regrettable, but it doesn’t make them right and us wrong. I’m all for rescuing cats and dogs, but I draw the line at rescuing snakes. I know the dangers that a rattlesnake presents.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Hillary’s Candidacy Is Weak, Very Weak

COMMON SENSE: Amazingly, people seem to think Hillary Clinton’s election to the White House is inevitable, when the exact opposite is true. In reality, she is the weakest candidate running . . . by far.

 

Let me explain. In states that normally vote for a Democrat in the General Election, she is being trounced by The Bern—a clueless Socialist, but also a decent man. When I say trounced, I mean decimated. In last week’s primaries, for example, The Bern received more than 70% of the vote.

 

Where Hillary is supposed to be strong, as the Democratic nominee, she is weak, but she does have a sizable lead in the delegates. The reason for this, other than the corruptible Super Delegates, is Hillary has soundly defeated The Bern in SC and other Southern states. Being first, SC was Hillary’s “Firewall,” according to the pundits. She beat The Bern handily, but in a General Election, what do you think Hillary’s chances are of winning SC? Let me tell you: Zero!

 

Regardless of who the Republicans choose, their candidate will beat Hillary in SC. The same is true in every other Southern state where Hillary won in the Democratic Primary. In the General Election, she will not win any of these states, but none of the commentators ever mention this, do they?

 

In the states she needs to win—the Blue States—she is losing big time, and in the states she has no chance of taking from the Republicans—the Red States—she seems strong, but it’s only because of the black community, which isn’t large enough to carry any Southern State.

 

This alone shows you exactly how vulnerable she is, especially if the Republicans ever get their act together, which they may not.

 

One more thing: We still have not heard what the FBI has to say about her criminal behavior. When we do, the few people who mistakenly believe she is trustworthy and honest may change their minds.

—Jack Watts

 

 

Read Full Post »

Trump & Cruz Need to Be More Presidential

COMMON SENSE: Although nearly everybody predicted Ted Cruz and Donald Trump would be among first candidates to drop out of the Republican race, they are the last two standing. (Mathematically, Kasich cannot win). There is a reason for this. Both have tapped into the deepest desires of Conservative, which isn’t fear but righteous indignation. That’s the good news.

 

Here’s the bad news. Yesterday, ISIS attacked Brussels—just like it attacked Paris four months ago. Watching this on TV, Americans are justifiably concerned. We need leadership, but we’re not getting it. Obama hasn’t provided any, and Hillary is incapable of doing so. This has left a vacuum both of the Republican contenders should have addressed.

 

Instead of being Presidential, however, the two of them are Tweeting nonsense about each other’s wives. How juvenile. How inappropriate. And how trivial. If either of you intend to be our Commander-in-Chief, act the part. Grow up! Man up! And take charge.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

No Progressive Can Win Against ISIS

COMMON SENSE: Despite the dramatic upsurge in power by ISIS, resulting in worldwide carnage, the Obama administration fully intends to empty GITMO—just to fulfill a campaign pledge to Hollywood’s Radical Left. This is not only foolhardy, but it also provides a clue as to why no Progressive can adequately lead the fight against global terrorism. Let me explain why.

 

Progressives—like Obama, Hillary, Kerry, and The Bern—do not see the world as it really is. They see it through the prism of their flawed ideology. Because Progressives are non-theistic, even if they have rudimentary god-consciousness, they cannot fathom how Islamic Jihadists think, which is in chiliastic terms. Radical Muslims believe in their 12th Caliphate as strongly as evangelicals believe in the Second Coming of Christ. Because the Progressive worldview is materialistic and not spiritual, however, they can’t understand those who have an entirely different perspective.

 

Consequently, the only answers Progressives have for the problem are based on what they know. Progressives believe Muslim unrest is caused by poverty and hopelessness. It’s because of global warming. Muslims don’t want to live in the hot desert. It’s because their population is exploding, and they need more room to grow and expand. They need to know we want to help them.

 

None of these answers are accurate. They have nothing to do with global Jihadism. Muslims are terrorists because it’s what Allah has commanded them to do—plain and simple. They are afraid of hell more than they are afraid of death, and your mortal enemies are Israel and the Great Satan—the USA.

 

If your worldview is Judeo-Christian, you may not like the Islamic perspective but you can understand it. If you are a Progressive, you cannot. For a Progressive, it simply doesn’t compute. Unfortunately, we are being led by Progressives who are incapable of understanding the seminal problem. Thus, they are incapable of defending us adequately against Radical Islam.

 

Hillary has proven she doesn’t have a clue about what motivates Muslims. As Secretary of State, she was a disaster. If she becomes Commander-in-Chief, ISIS will continue to grow, despite the Leftist rhetoric that consistently denies that it is. To defeat ISIS, you not only have to identify it correctly, but you also have to understand what motivates it to be convinced that wanton terrorism is a good thing. Why so few understand how simple this is is beyond me, but they don’t.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Progressives, by Nature, Cannot Defeat Islamic Terrorism

 

 

COMMON SENSE: Concerning terrorism, there is a fundamental difference between the way the Left sees it and how the Right does. Progressives—like Obama, Hillary, Kerry, and The Bern—believe we have caused Islamic people to hate us, which makes the lion’s share of the problem ours. So, what we need to do is make the lives of Radical Jihadists better. If we do, in time, the problem will solve itself. Be nice to them and they will eventually be nice to us. Besides, there are only a few who have been radicalized. The rest of Islam is peaceful.

Conservatives—like Trump, Cruz, Netanyahu, and others—believe that the problem originates with the way Islam views the world. Those who take the Koran literally—the Radical Jihadists—believe the USA is filled with infidels, making us the Great Satan. Therefore, by nature we are Evil and deserve to be the object of terror. Jews are even worse than us and need to be exterminated.

Conservatives believe the problem originates with the belief system of Muslims. Therefore, for a Conservative to make policies based on being nice to Jihadists would be viewed as cowardly, capitulating to Evil. The way to defeat Islamic terrorism is to identify it, call it what it is, and make policies aimed at defeating them militarily, sending them back to the Stone Age.

In this upcoming election, the choice Americans make will go a long way toward either solving the problem or making it worse. If you believe Muslims hate us for good reason, vote for Hillary or The Bern. They will govern in a similar way to Obama, which is to not deal with the problem effectively. If you think Radical Islam is Evil and needs to be defeated decisively, vote for Trump or Cruz. They will not coddle terrorists, and they recognize there is a fundamental problem with the belief system of Muslims.

The media and our feckless national leaders want to make this issue more complex than it is. It’s as simple as what I have just described. There’s a reason why they want to keep you confused. If we accept their version of reality as accurate, we will continue to be more passive than aggressive in confronting the problem, and that’s what they want. After all, America is responsible for causing all of the problems in the world. Everybody, other than ignorant Conservatives, realizes that.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

A Vote for Hillary Is a Vote for Global Retreat

COMMON SENSE: Remember this? It’s when Iran detained sailors from the US Navy earlier this year. When this happened, what was the response of the Obama administration? Secretary of State John Kerry thanked Iran for treating our sailors well. No kidding.

 

Is this the kind of leadership we want? Is this the kind of leadership we deserve?

 

Being we are the cause of all the problems in the world, according to Progressives like Hillary and The Bern, such treatment is what we deserve. Do you agree with them? I certainly don’t.

 

Because of Obama’s flawed worldview, implemented by Hillary and John Kerry, America is now in full retreat globally, which has destabilized the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and even Latin America.

 

If this is what you want, Hillary is your girl. If it isn’t, then stop fretting and get behind either Cruz or Trump—both of whom are committed to restoring the military to pre-Obama effectiveness.

 

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Because I’m an Adult, I Will Vote for Trump

COMMON SENSE: I’m getting a little tired of so many people bashing Donald Trump, saying that he would be “disastrous” as President. I don’t believe that for one minute. He certainly wasn’t my first choice, but I think he might prove to be a very good President, perhaps even an exceptional one. Here are the reasons why:

 

1. Trump is a winner—something most of the Establishment Republicans are not.

 

2. He is extraordinarily successful, parlaying $1 million into $10 billion. How many people have done that? We could use a lot more like him.

 

3. He knows his strengths, but more importantly, he knows his limitations. So, instead of micromanaging foreign policy or military strategy, for instance—like both Obama and Jimmy Carter have done—Trump is smart enough to function like the Chairman of the Board. All he has to do is give broad directives, leaving policy implementation to those who are already experts, which most Presidents aren’t wise enough to do.

 

4. The idea that he is unelectable is absurd. Hillary is a weak candidate. She’s shrill, angry, old, sick, and corrupt. Trump should beat her easily, and I believe he will. Remember, the FBI is still looming.

 

My choice has always been Cruz, because I’m a Constitutionalist, but I believe Trump will be our candidate. Rather than whine and become indignant, saying I will never vote for a man who makes outlandish statements, I choose to be an adult and do what is best for our nation, which means I will vote for Trump if he wins the nomination, regardless of what Mitt Romney or Eric Erickson say to the contrary. I suggest you do the same.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Will the Senate Republicans Hold Firm on SCOTUS?

COMMON SENSE: Many of us worked diligently to flip the Senate in 2014, only to discover that it made virtually no difference. The Republicans consistently caved into Barack Obama’s demands. More than anything, this explains Donald Trump’s popularity with the American people. If Obama is Putin’s “bitch,” which he is, then the Senate Republicans are Obama’s.

 

But they do have an opportunity to redeem themselves. With the nomination of Judge Garland to fill the vacancy on the Supreme Court, the Senate has a chance to make things right with its core constituency—people like you and me. The Republican Senators seem determined, but they are a weak-willed lot. My guess is they will stand firm for one reason: They fear the wrath of the electorate—you and me—more than that of a lame-duck President. Nevertheless, even on their best day, the resolve of the Republicans is tenuous at best.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

It Will Either Be Trump or Cruz

COMMON SENSE: Kasich’s victory in Ohio has done one thing—muddy the waters, giving hope to the RINO Establishment—but that’s all. In most states, he has received less than 10 percent of the vote. With Rubio out, this race is between Trump and Cruz, with Kasich will be nothing more than a distraction, whining that he doesn’t receive more attention. He doesn’t receive it because, other than Ohio, he generates about as much enthusiasm as kissing a sibling.

 

Nevertheless, his victory has put a smile on Romney’s face, as the RINO oligarchy plots ways to disenfranchise the will of the people, which is either Trump or Cruz.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »

Focus on What is Important . . . Beating Hillary

COMMON SENSE: In an intense Presidential Election Cycle, it’s important to differentiate between what is important and what is less than important. If you don’t, you will be captivated by all sorts of trivial things that will throw you into meaningless frenzies. Here are some things that are important:

1. We are over $19 trillion in debt—half of it from Obama. Who can change the dynamics so that we will once again be prosperous?

2. Our standing in the world has diminished. Our friends don’t trust us, and our enemies don’t fear us. Who has the capacity to strengthen the military and be an effective Commander-in-Chief?

3. Millions of Radical Islamic Jihadists believe the USA is the Great Satan and want to behead us. Who is strong enough to identify the problem accurately, confront it head-on, and destroy this threat?

4. Our Southern border is a joke. More illegals are coming through this year than ever before. Who will change this?

5. Our healthcare system, once the envy of the world, has been purposefully destroyed. Who can fix it?

6. Currently, 93 million people are out of the workforce. Who can create jobs and not just talk about it?

These are important questions. The following issues are not:

1. Who has the biggest ears, smallest hands, etc?

2. Who has ties to Goldman-Sachs?

3. Whose wife would make the best First Lady?

4. Who do the polls say has the best chance of beating Hillary?

5. Another 1,000 idiotic questions like these.

Keep your eye on the balls, y’all, and everything else will work out. Hillary is vulnerable. The only way she can win is if we continue to self-destruct. This is why I write COMMON SENSE. My hope is that people will use common sense, rather than get caught up in meaningless minutia.

—Jack Watts

Read Full Post »